Australian customs officers have been given new powers to search incoming travellers’ laptops and mobile phones for pornography, a spokeswoman for the Australian sex industry says.

Fiona Patten, president of the Australian Sex Party, is demanding an inquiry into why a new question appears on Incoming Passenger Cards asking people if they are carrying “pornography”.

Patten said officials now had an unfettered right to examine travellers’ electronic devices, marking the beginning of a new era of official investigation into people’s private lives. She questioned whether it was appropriate to search people for legal R18+ and X18+ material.

Travellers to be searched for porn
ASHER MOSES
May 20, 2010 – 4:38PM

Comments 145

Australian customs officers have been given new powers to search incoming travellers’ laptops and mobile phones for pornography, a spokeswoman for the Australian sex industry says.

Fiona Patten, president of the Australian Sex Party, is demanding an inquiry into why a new question appears on Incoming Passenger Cards asking people if they are carrying “pornography”.

Patten said officials now had an unfettered right to examine travellers’ electronic devices, marking the beginning of a new era of official investigation into people’s private lives. She questioned whether it was appropriate to search people for legal R18+ and X18+ material.
Advertisement: Story continues below

“Is it fair that customs officers rummage through someone’s luggage and pull out a legal men’s magazine or a lesbian journal in front of their children or their mother-in-law?” she said.

“If you and your partner have filmed or photographed yourselves making love in an exotic destination or even taking a bath, you will have to answer ‘Yes’ to the question or you will be breaking the law.”

Customs confirmed the new reference to “pornography” on the Incoming Passenger Cards and the search powers, acknowledging that searches conducted by officers may involve the discovery of “personal or sensitive possessions”.

A spokesman said officers were trained to apply “tact and discretion” in their dealings with passengers.

“Including an express reference to pornography is intended to enhance the interception of prohibited pornography at the border, by making passengers aware that some forms of pornography may be a prohibited import,” the spokesman said.

The “pornography” question has appeared on the cards since September last year. The change was only spotted by Patten earlier this month and it had received little to no coverage in the media.

Colin Jacobs, chairman of the lobby group Electronic Frontiers Australia, said the change appeared to have sneaked under the radar “without any public consultation about the massive privacy issues”.

“It’s hard to fathom what the pressing concern could be that requires Australia to quiz every entrant to the country on their pornography habits, as if visitors would be aware of the nuances of the Australian classification scheme,” he said.

“If this results in Customs trawling through more private information on laptops searching for contraband, I would say the solution is way worse than the problem.”

Patten said if the question was designed to stop child pornography being smuggled into the country then the question should have been asked about “child pornography”, without encompassing regular porn.

Hetty Johnson, chief executive of child protection group Bravehearts, agreed with Patten that the question was too broad. She said it should only apply to illegal pornography.

“If it said child porn I’d be 100 per cent behind it – if you’re carrying child pornography then you deserve everything you get,” she said in a phone interview.

The issue has echoes of the 1956 detention of famed British conductor and composer Sir Eugene Goossens who had his bag searched upon his return from Europe.

He was carrying material that was considered, at the time, pornographic and his reputation was subsequently ruined, forcing him to flee the country.

“The term pornography is not referred to at all in the federal Classification Act, which customs relies on to classify their material,” Patten said.

Porn star Stormy Daniels is considering running for the Republican’s seat in 2010. Sen. David Vitter of Louisiana is facing a potentially challenge by boobs.

Daniels, the star of such films as “Operating Desert Stormy,” will launch a “listening tour” across the state next week, to “meet with Louisiana men and women and listen to the issues and concerns they struggle with every day.”

Daniels is not affiliated with a political party, but her listening tour will focus on the economy, working women and child protection.

Fans have been wooing the 29-year-old to run for office by launching the Web site, DraftStormy.com , which calls the 2010 race an “opportunity to start with a clean slate, to elect a representative that we can be proud of, who will work tirelessly, and who will challenge the status quo.” The site features the slogan: “It’s the economy, sexy.”

If Daniels runs against Vitter, it won’t be Vitter’s first encounter with the sex industry. In 2007, Vitter confessed to “a very serious sin in my past,” referring to his link to Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the so-called “D.C. Madam.”